Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rush: "The replacement for coal doesn't exist."
#40
TheRealVille Wrote:I answered all of them. In sum, it's just as easy and almost as cheap to use nuclear energy as it is coal, and a whole lot cleaner. The questions are red herrings.

Hey, I not against nuclear power, in fact I think nuclear power is a must if we want to become engery independent. I just don't think 10 years is a reasonable time table to replace 40% of their electricity, I think a 20-25 year timetable is more reasonable.

As I've said many times before as a nation we need to be engery indepentent and to do this we will need energy from all sources including wind, solar, coal, gas, oil , nuclear and whatever else we can think of.
Messages In This Thread
Rush: "The replacement for coal doesn't exist." - by Old School - 07-22-2009, 08:50 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)