Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rush: "The replacement for coal doesn't exist."
#15
jetpilot Wrote:Again shows your ignorance. If YOU want to be taken seriously, actually take a few minutes to read the article and try discussing the points it makes instead of making stupid personal attacks. Again, no decent discussion of the issues, only more wasted bandwidth from you...:flush:
I have read the article, it is full of Rush copying and pasting a couple of people that I don't know have any validity whatsoever. Where is their proof of 90% higher energy bills? Asking ANYBODY to read Rush and take him seriously, is like asking a baptist, to read Benny Hinn and take anything he says serious. Rush says CA won't get energy from nuclear power as long as Hayden and Fonda are alive, yet there are two nuclear powerhouses in CA, totaling 5 units at both sites. You tell me why I should take Rush serious, when he lies outright?
Quote:'LADWP will deliver 40 percent renewable power, with the remainder coming from natural gas, nuclear, and large hydroelectric,' said Villaraigosa." Nuclear? Not as long as Tom Hayden is still alive; not as long as Jane Fonda still live. ****, you don't even need those two.
Messages In This Thread
Rush: "The replacement for coal doesn't exist." - by TheRealVille - 07-05-2009, 05:06 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)