[PhiSlamaJama#12]

Wow, what a ridiculous post. Since apparently you don't know how college basketball's post-season works, let me educate you...

The NIT is for teams that didn't get into the "big dance". Playing in the All-A Classic doesn't prclude anyone from playing in the Sweet Sixteen, and Hazard, SV, and Elliott are proof of that. So to compare the All-A title to the NIT is laughable.

If no one really wants to win the All-A, then why was Elliott even in it? I'll tell you, it's because they wanted to win it, same as SV. And their fans on here thought that the All-A title was in the bag, then were absolutely shocked that they lost to lowly Shelby Valley. I know that if Elliott had won the All-A title, you people wouldn't be on here acting like it meant nothing. But since SV won it, suddenly it's no big deal.

If you all want to say " so what, SV won the All-A, it's no big deal" that's fine. But what does it say about a team that didn't even win it?

Exactly, great post. If Elliot would have won the All "A" then their fans would be on here saying "We got the All "A" title and beat SV at rupp". But since SV won the All "A" and beat Elliot they say it isnt a big deal. SV can now hang up a state championship banner, Elliot can't say that.