[NEWARKCATHOLICFAN]

I also work at Wal-Mart.

Thats more than likely incorrect information. Theres probably more to the story than what she is stating.

9 times out of 10 managers take employees side over the customer.

When an employee gets in trouble at Wal-Mart they have to go through what they call the "Coaching" process.

The fist time you get into trouble you get a verbal coaching, they tell you what you done wrong, and talk to you about how you can improve.

Step 2 is a written coaching, which is the samething as a verbal but it is put on your record, and it expires after 1 year.

Step 3, is a D-Day. Which is a decesion making day. You get a paid day off, you have to write a paper to the store manager and then he decides if you should stay with the company. This also rolls off after 1 year.

After your 90 day eval with the company, Wal-Mart cannot legally get rid of you without the coaching process, unless you steal or something to that nature.

They will not get rid of you from hear say. Like a customer complaint.

And as far as Wal-Mart winning this is incorrect also. Most of the times judges take the side of the Plantiff. Wal-Mart is a multi-billion dollar business, they rarely win. Wal-Mart looses or settles cases out of court probably 75% of the time.

Again this is the correct policy but in a right to work state such as Ohio they do not have to follow this. Why? As my attorney told me they, Walmnart knows that a person will not fight this becasue it cost to m uch money in attorney fees. I know first hand becasue when I got terminated five or six years back I contacted everyone in the chain of command that we had to and then I went to the attorney.