[alfus21]

I dont think so. I believe Liggens gives UK a better chance at winning games, but that's just my opinion

Based upon what?

At least give some reasoning behind starting LiggIns over Porter.

Take a look at the last few games.

Vandy
Porter 8 points, 2 assists, 2 turnovers, 1 steal, 1 rebound
Liggins 1 point (0-5 from the field) 2 assists, 1 turnover, 5 rebounds

Louisville
Porter 8 points, 1 assist, 1 steal, 0 turnovers
Liggins 2 points, 2 assists, 1 steal, 3 turnovers

Central Michigan
Porter 12 points, 3 assists, 1 steal, 4 turnovers
Liggins 6 points, 8 assists, 5 turnovers

Florida Atlantic
Porter 2 points, 5 assists, 1 turnover
Liggins 3 points, 2 assist, 1 turnover

Tennessee State
Porter 0 points, 7 assists, 1 turnover
Liggins 7 points, 3 assists, 3 turnovers

Appalachian State
Porter 3 points, 5 assists, 1 turnover
Liggins 2 points, 3 assists, 4 turnovers

Indiana
Porter 0 points, 4 assists, 2 turnovers
Liggins 10 points, 3 assists, 6 turnovers

So since the Indiana game the numbers look like this....

Porter has 33 points, 27 assists, 11 turnovers....

Liggins has 31 points, 23 assists, [COLOR="Red"]23 turnovers
[/COLOR]

I know statistically speaking, that Liggins is more of a scoring threat, but in my opinion these numbers show that Porter is giving us the best chance to win by not giving the ball up to the other team, and dishing it out pretty good as well recently.