[Benchwarmer]

Actually, before you start throwing insults you need to get your facts straight. KCC was 1-3 in the district with their only being against Cordia by a score of 8-3, and Cordia was 1-6 in the district with their only win being against KCC by a score of 15-2. Cordia's overall record was 6-18, KCC's overall record was 2-25, so add in the head to head matchup and Cordia becomes ranked higher than KCC because of the 15-2 score and the overall record. Regardless they are both terrible and two of the worst teams in the region.

Just because Cordia played more district games during the course of the year and KCC only played 4 doesn't make them a better team, one was 1-3 and one was 1-6, and if I was guess i would say if KCC would have played 7 district games their record would have been 1-6 also, but like i said if you really want to get technical about something stupid like this than go ahead, and just in case you want to tell me i don't know what im talking about again heres the link so you can look it up yourself......

http://scoreboard.12dt.com/scoreboard/kh...ba08/26911

Can we start talking about teams that actually matter now?

Why did you bring up regional and overall records? You are the one who brought up district play and Cordia. Know you bring up IF KCC had played 7 district games they would have lost. How do you know? KCC 1-3 in district play 33% winning percentage. Cordia 1-6 in district play that is 16% winning percentage.