[thecavemaster]

It is a different type of evolution that you are speaking of however. Yes, we adapt to our environments, and animals adapt to their environments, but that in no way proves or shows that we evolved from primordial soup because of our environments.

Darwinian evolution is a bad thing mostly because it was given as an alternate view to creation. Darwin himself denounced his faith and gave this idea from his studies. Although Darwin was very intelligent, he was also biased in his theories.

God is the one who divided us at the Tower of Babel. It is because of Him that we speak different languages, live all over the world, etc. The humans defyed the command of God to multiply and fill the earth. Humans decided to glorify and worship their own minds and abilities (sound familiar). It still happens today.

The only thing I reject is the fact that Darwinian evolution dismisses the God of the Bible, and it rejects the historically reliable fact that Jesus died and resurrected to defeat death which entered the world through the fall of Adam and Eve. Instead, it pushes that death and decay were part of the world for millions of years, and then humans came at some point, but it isn't because of their sin that death entered the world. It's just like that, so essentially the entire orthodoxy of christian belief becomes invalid. However, it is not historically reliable.

"We walk by faith and not by sight..." Digging through archaeological sights for the elusive ark and other such endeavors, then turning to a doubting or unbelieving world and saying, "See, see, we told you; we told you." I believe; therefore, evidence as the world counts it is non-essential. Flesh understands flesh; spirit understands spirit.