Thread Rating:
12-24-2007, 05:12 PM
crawdad Wrote:At a time when the Supreme Court was packed with liberals, they simply stretched the constitution to allow infanticide. How can a dirty little secret have more protection under the constitution than another's right to live.
Once again, "infanticide" requires an infant. To equate a first trimester fetus with a viable infant does not compute to exact equivalence.
![[-]](https://bluegrassrivals.com/forum/images/lifestyle/collapse.png)
Messages In This Thread
A question for pro choicers. - by sherman14 - 12-20-2007, 11:18 AM
A question for pro choicers. - by thecavemaster - 12-20-2007, 12:28 PM
A question for pro choicers. - by The Guru - 12-20-2007, 01:17 PM
A question for pro choicers. - by ronald_reagan - 12-20-2007, 02:11 PM
A question for pro choicers. - by The Guru - 12-20-2007, 10:39 PM
A question for pro choicers. - by The Guru - 12-20-2007, 10:42 PM
A question for pro choicers. - by ronald_reagan - 12-20-2007, 10:55 PM
A question for pro choicers. - by The Guru - 12-20-2007, 11:21 PM
A question for pro choicers. - by ronald_reagan - 12-20-2007, 11:32 PM
A question for pro choicers. - by thecavemaster - 12-21-2007, 09:24 AM
A question for pro choicers. - by ronald_reagan - 12-21-2007, 09:30 AM
A question for pro choicers. - by Nancy_Reagan - 12-22-2007, 09:04 AM
A question for pro choicers. - by ~Pirates Pack a Punch~ - 12-22-2007, 09:57 AM
A question for pro choicers. - by crawdad - 12-24-2007, 03:43 PM
A question for pro choicers. - by thecavemaster - 12-24-2007, 05:12 PM
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
