Thread Rating:
12-16-2007, 05:43 PM
point # 23 should read like this,...sorry for the mistake.
23. We demand freedom for all religious faiths in the state, insofar as they do not endanger its existence or offend the moral and ethical sense of the Christian faith. The party as such represents the point of view of a positive Christianity without binding itself to any one particular confession. It fights against materialist spirit within and without, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our citizens can only come about from within on the pinciple:
COMMON GOOD BEFORE INDIVIDUAL GOOD
And no that wasn't a Freudian slip.
23. We demand freedom for all religious faiths in the state, insofar as they do not endanger its existence or offend the moral and ethical sense of the Christian faith. The party as such represents the point of view of a positive Christianity without binding itself to any one particular confession. It fights against materialist spirit within and without, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our citizens can only come about from within on the pinciple:
COMMON GOOD BEFORE INDIVIDUAL GOOD
And no that wasn't a Freudian slip.
Messages In This Thread
Would you support this political platform? - by DevilsWin - 12-16-2007, 01:50 AM
Would you support this political platform? - by ronald_reagan - 12-16-2007, 03:47 AM
Would you support this political platform? - by DevilsWin - 12-16-2007, 05:43 PM
Would you support this political platform? - by ComfortEagle - 12-16-2007, 06:13 PM
Would you support this political platform? - by DevilsWin - 12-16-2007, 06:15 PM
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)