[thecavemaster]

No investigation will ever have every piece of evidence and bit of information. Take a trial for instance, it is not needed to know everything as someone on the juror.. you just need to know the facts that prove without a doubt that the person committed the crime. And the Warren commission does this quite well.

The WC takes an event of only 5 seconds or so in length, and makes an 888 page report out of it, further releasing 26 volumes of records including documents, 552 depositions, 3100 exhibits, etc. While the Iraq Study group that studied information from the past 25 years leading up to the war in Iraq, was only 160 pages. The 9/11 commission report, investigating the attacks that nearly leveled our country, economy, and killed 3000 innocent people.. studied 15 years worth of information, and was 585 pages in length. These two massive studies and commissions final reports, total only 745 pages...

So to say that the Warren Commission was lacking in their depth, would be hard to swallow. Sure, there's probably a thing or two they missed. But if in a trial, someone confessed and there was video of the suspect committing the crime... how much more do we need to know? Even if it was something planned over the course of 10 years, and thousands of dollars..... as a juror you wouldn't need anything else to convict. Every piece of evidence in it points to LHO... From buying the gun, to being a sharp shooter, to killing a cop, to never saying he didn't kill the president, to being in the building the shots came from...

Let me show you a good picture of the 'magic bullet' that conspiracy theorists never seem to show on their shows, or in their books. They make it act as if this bullet hit JFK, a seat, a back, a leg, and a wrist.. and then comes out perfect as if it had never even been shot. Here is the picture they use.

[Image: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ce399.jpg]

Here is a picture from the Warren Commission: (its the center section of the bullet, notice how mushroomed this bullet is. You will never see conspiracy theorists using this picture to prove their point. Which is exactly what makes a conspiracy theorist, a conspiracy theorist. They try to prove that there's more to the story. And in fact there is.. you're just not telling it.)

[Image: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ce399.gif]

And plus, "MythBusters" proved it. So I can't help but believe it now.

Interesting stuff, RR. While I think Oswald acted alone, I can see how it is hard to swallow that a guy like Oswald could kill the President of the United States. Osward, JW Boothe, Hinkley... disgruntled or crazy or both... Does it ever blow your mind that Hinkley shot the President to impress Jodi Foster? ****, that was even before Silence of the Lambs... ha ha