[More Cowbell]

Uhh...

I voted yes because I assumed the question was just about the BCS championship game, not the entire slate of BCS games. The BCS was really just set up to get the top two teams in the title game, after that the other bowls are on their own to choose whoever they want, within certain parameters.

Now, do I think the other BCS bowls made the correct choices? Absolutely not. Missouri should be in the Orange Bowl instead of Kansas. KU has no freakin' business being in a BCS bowl at all. They beat no one of consequence all year, and lost the only game they played against a good team. To me, selecting them for a BCS bowl is actually rewarding them for scheduling such a pathetic slate of nonconference games. They should be knocked all the way down to the KFC Bowl for being too chicken to play anyone this year. I hope Virginia Tech torches them by 40 and exposes them as a fraud.

Also, while I understand the Rose Bowl wanting a Big Ten team, Illinois also does not belong in a BCS bowl. They could have selected another team to face USC and had a more attractive game, such as Georgia or West Virginia. Again, hopefully the Trojans spank them and show the stuffed shirts at the Rose Bowl that making the best game should be the primary concern, not preserving some stupid tradition of inviting teams from two particular conferences.