Thread Rating:
12-05-2007, 08:50 PM
thecavemaster Wrote:You have memorized the party line, the talking point very well. But other than being just another GUESSER, how do you KNOW any of what you just said?
You think the 'party line' is that we should have nuked sooner? What party do you think I'm from. It was the democratic party who funded it, socialists like Einstein who built, and a democrat president who dropped it.
And being other than a guesser, I don't know it to be a fact. Does that make you happy?
But it was just a guess that it'd end the war as well... and how did that turn out?
All unproven things are guesses until put to the test, and you my friend, would never have known an end to Japanese rule of Oceania Asia, the oppression and genocide in China, etc. And thats MY guess. Whats yours?
I tend to take the Ann Coulter stance on foreign policy when shaken to action. However, I'm non interventionist in matters that don't affect me.
But for the Ann Coulter in me, please read: (It is IMO one of the most emotional writings I've ever read... I love it.)
Quote:Barbara Olson kept her cool. In the hysteria and terror of hijackers herding passengers to the rear of the plane, she retrieved her cell phone and called her husband, Ted, the solicitor general of the United States. She informed him that he had better call the FBI â the plane had been hijacked. According to reports, Barbara was still on the phone with Ted when her plane plunged in a fiery explosion directly into the Pentagon.
Barbara risked having her neck slit to warn the country of a terrorist attack. She was a patriot to the very end.
This is not to engage in the media's typical hallucinatory overstatement about anyone who is the victim of a horrible tragedy. The furtive cell phone call was an act of incredible daring and panache. If it were not, we'd be hearing reports of a hundred more cell phone calls. (Even people who swear to hate cell phones carry them for commercial air travel.)
The last time I saw Barbara in person was about three weeks ago. She generously praised one of my recent columns and told me I had really found my niche. Ted, she said, had taken to reading my columns aloud to her over breakfast.
I mention that to say three things about Barbara. First, she was really nice. A lot of people on TV seem nice, but aren't. (And some who don't seem nice, are.) But Barbara was always her charming, graceful, vebullient self. "Nice" is an amazingly rare quality among writers. In the opinion business, bitter, jealous hatred is the norm. Barbara had reason to be secure.
Second, it was actually easy to imagine Ted reading political columns aloud to Barbara at the breakfast table. Theirs was a relationship that could only be cheaply imitated by Bill and Hillary â the latter being a subject of Barbara's appropriately biting bestseller, **** to Pay. Hillary claimed preposterously in the Talk magazine interview that she discussed policy with Bill while cutting his grapefruit in the morning. Ted and Barbara really did talk politics â and really did have breakfast together.
It's "Ted and Barbara" just like it's Fred and Ginger, and George and Gracie. They were so perfect together, so obvious, that their friends were as happy they were on their wedding day. This is more than the death of a great person and patriotic American. It's a human amputation.
Third, since Barbara's compliment, I've been writing my columns for Ted and Barbara. I'm always writing to someone in my head. Now I don't know who to write to. Ted-and-Barbara were a good muse.
Apart from hearing that this beautiful light has been extinguished from the world, only one other news flash broke beyond the numbingly omnipresent horror of the entire day. That evening, CNN reported that bombs were dropping in Afghanistan â and then updated the report to say they weren't our bombs.
They should have been ours. I want them to be ours.
This is no time to be precious about locating the exact individuals directly involved in this particular terrorist attack. Those responsible include anyone anywhere in the world who smiled in response to the annihilation of patriots like Barbara Olson.
We don't need long investigations of the forensic evidence to determine with scientific accuracy the person or persons who ordered this specific attack. We don't need an "international coalition." We don't need a study on "terrorism." We certainly didn't need a congressional resolution condemning the attack this week.
The nation has been invaded by a fanatical, murderous cult. And we welcome them. We are so good and so pure we would never engage in discriminatory racial or "religious" profiling.
People who want our country destroyed live here, work for our airlines, and are submitted to the exact same airport shakedown as a lumberman from Idaho. This would be like having the Wehrmacht immigrate to America and work for our airlines during World War II. Except the Wehrmacht was not so bloodthirsty.
"All of our lives" don't need to change, as they keep prattling on TV. Every single time there is a terrorist attack â or a plane crashes because of pilot error â Americans allow their rights to be contracted for no purpose whatsoever.
The airport kabuki theater of magnetometers, asinine questions about whether passengers "packed their own bags," and the hostile, lumpen mesomorphs ripping open our luggage somehow allowed over a dozen armed hijackers to board four American planes almost simultaneously on Bloody Tuesday. (Did those fabulous security procedures stop a single hijacker anyplace in America that day?)
Airports scrupulously apply the same laughably ineffective airport harassment to Suzy Chapstick as to Muslim hijackers. It is preposterous to assume every passenger is a potential crazed homicidal maniac. We know who the homicidal maniacs are. They are the ones cheering and dancing right now.
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.
Messages In This Thread
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by BFritz - 09-20-2007, 02:37 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by DevilsWin - 09-20-2007, 03:34 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by TidesHoss32 - 09-20-2007, 04:48 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by -STAT- - 09-20-2007, 09:48 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by BFritz - 09-20-2007, 09:57 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by TidesHoss32 - 09-21-2007, 01:20 AM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by BFritz - 09-23-2007, 05:43 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by rallo316 - 09-24-2007, 10:08 AM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by DevilsWin - 09-24-2007, 12:08 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by ronald_reagan - 12-04-2007, 06:32 AM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by vundy33 - 12-04-2007, 11:44 AM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by ronald_reagan - 12-04-2007, 12:26 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by vundy33 - 12-04-2007, 03:04 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by ronald_reagan - 12-04-2007, 03:18 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by thecavemaster - 12-04-2007, 05:44 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by ronald_reagan - 12-04-2007, 10:34 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by thecavemaster - 12-05-2007, 08:40 AM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by GodisAshlandTomcat41 - 12-05-2007, 08:42 AM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by ronald_reagan - 12-05-2007, 08:46 AM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by thecavemaster - 12-05-2007, 02:29 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by vundy33 - 12-05-2007, 02:59 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by thecavemaster - 12-05-2007, 03:07 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by DevilsWin - 12-05-2007, 03:42 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by thecavemaster - 12-05-2007, 03:54 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by ronald_reagan - 12-05-2007, 06:59 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by thecavemaster - 12-05-2007, 08:33 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by ronald_reagan - 12-05-2007, 08:50 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by thecavemaster - 12-05-2007, 08:56 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by ronald_reagan - 12-05-2007, 08:59 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by thecavemaster - 12-05-2007, 09:01 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by ronald_reagan - 12-05-2007, 09:04 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by thecavemaster - 12-05-2007, 09:07 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by ronald_reagan - 12-05-2007, 09:08 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by thecavemaster - 12-05-2007, 09:11 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by ronald_reagan - 12-05-2007, 09:14 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by thecavemaster - 12-05-2007, 09:16 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by ronald_reagan - 12-05-2007, 09:19 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by ronald_reagan - 12-05-2007, 09:20 PM
Bin Laden calls for a Pakistani revolt. - by thecavemaster - 12-05-2007, 09:23 PM
Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)