Thread Rating:
11-28-2007, 09:30 PM
ronald_reagan Wrote:The right to privacy spoken of in supreme court decisions, protects people from the governments intrusion. Not person to person. The 1st amendment protects what these people do. Not the 14th amendment as you imply.
There are more rights than what are listed in the Constitution, via the 9th amendment.
Obviously the judge in the above case sees that it's an invasion of privacy.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Messages In This Thread
Westboro Church fined! - by Midee1 - 11-01-2007, 07:38 AM
Westboro Church fined! - by Beef - 11-01-2007, 08:12 AM
Westboro Church fined! - by Midee1 - 11-01-2007, 08:24 AM
Westboro Church fined! - by thecavemaster - 11-01-2007, 04:45 PM
Westboro Church fined! - by blitz43 - 11-14-2007, 01:41 PM
Westboro Church fined! - by vundy33 - 11-14-2007, 02:58 PM
Westboro Church fined! - by #1ukfan - 11-26-2007, 08:43 PM
Westboro Church fined! - by ronald_reagan - 11-28-2007, 02:01 AM
Westboro Church fined! - by vundy33 - 11-28-2007, 02:40 AM
Westboro Church fined! - by ronald_reagan - 11-28-2007, 02:49 AM
Westboro Church fined! - by Quando - 11-28-2007, 03:01 AM
Westboro Church fined! - by Beef - 11-28-2007, 03:35 AM
Westboro Church fined! - by ronald_reagan - 11-28-2007, 03:50 AM
Westboro Church fined! - by ComfortEagle - 11-28-2007, 04:01 AM
Westboro Church fined! - by ronald_reagan - 11-28-2007, 12:41 PM
Westboro Church fined! - by ComfortEagle - 11-28-2007, 09:30 PM
Westboro Church fined! - by ronald_reagan - 11-28-2007, 11:49 PM
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)