[ronald_reagan]

I may give someone power of attorney; however, within that framework, I have certain expectations of action. I am saying that there is evidence that Bill Clinton supported "war powers," but if "the Iraq thing" meant overthrow and long-term occupation, no. It is not clear to me that Clinton supported the strategic decisions. There is no doubt that Obama clearly opposed the war (whatever the strategy) from the beginning and that both Bill and Hillary approved of giving Bush "war powers."

I AGREE!!!!!!!

Why do you keep going back to the strategic errors??

As I said numerous times, we have all changed your views somewhat, and some no longer support the occupation. Clinton would NOT have done what Bush done. Thats what we both agree on. All I'm saying, and all you're missing is that he lied about his support for what DID happen. Its ok to change your mind. He apparently has, as I have. Its wrong to say you never supported it. When the record shows you did.

Whether he supported a larger war, a smaller war, or a proxy war.. we'll never know. we know though that he thought the president acted properly and with his support, but then again... we also know he didn't support it lol.

He sounds like he'd vote for it, before voting against it.

Look cavemaster, this conversation is going no where. Thus I will end my half of it, unless you can stop the bickering. This isn't an arguement or debateable point. The question is, why can't Clinton tell the truth? Not, why did he change his mind... or why does his wife have kankles... or whose camel would he kill with cruise missles??