[More Cowbell]

I know this is UK country, but they are terrible. They could give OSU a good game, but I don't think they could beat them. You just aren't getting it though, Oregon could beat LSU, they have more talent than the tigers. Plus you have to factor in the bottom. The Washingonts and Stanford could beat the Mississippi's and Vandy, you aren't comparing apples to apples. You can't just use the top 10, they have to be relative because the SEC has more teams. Plus the traditional powers in the SEC are a little off this year, does any truly think that the LSU offense is that good, no they are average at best.

Well, your opinion on UK football is not exactly unbiased, you've shown in the past that you hate Kentucky for some reason. I mean really, Oregon State? Please. They're not even close to being as good as UK this year. They might win if UK had an off-game, but if each team played as well as they could, UK would win by two touchdowns.

And as for Oregon, you can't actually believe they have more talent than LSU. The Tigers will probably have more players drafted in the first round than the Ducks will get in the entire draft. There's just no comparison. Now, am I saying Oregon can't beat LSU? No, I'm just saying LSU is the better team and would be favored to win on a neutral field.

Bottom line, the SEC not only has more good teams than the Pac-10, they have less bad teams too. Score another one for the SEC.