[Old School]

This is starting to get personal.

None of you want the companies to disobey the current laws, do you?

This is about a rule change. Do any of you want the rule changes cited in the article that started this whole debate to actually take effect.

If you do why. Don't you think it will have a damaging effect on the areas in which these practices will be taking place?

If you don't believe this change will have an adverse effect on those areas please explain why without rambling on and on about this and that program.

The meaning of the current law is what's being questioned, I consider this more of a clarification of the current law than anything else. Anti-Coal groups want to include Intermittent (streams that do not carry water year round) and Ephermeral (streams that only carry water during a rain or snow event) streams into the buffer zone ruling. The Coal industry believes that these should not be included in the buffer zone because they do not carry water year round.

DW, I hope I didn't ramble to much for you.