[BCFan]

Yes, without a reasonable doubt it was incomplete, because his hand wasn't under the ball, and that was the argument that you originally made. Now you're saying that his left hand might have had control, which then the ball wouldn't have been moving around so much, and I believe that your hands have to be under it or show visible control before the ball hits the ground, which neither hand was under it and it was moving around too much to have ever showed control.

Say what you want, but I'm going to stick with the experienced professionals. It's definitely an arguable call, but theres going to be one of those every game and if your a good enough team, you can overcome it. Just look at the interception call against Pittsburgh in 05 against Indy, and you will understand what I'm saying.

When the original ruling is a completed pass, they look for evidence saying it's not. And they had no evidence to say his left hand was not on the ball. And everyone knows Randy Cross hates Pittsburgh.