[BFritz]

Whos to say his left hand wasn't still wrapped around the ball when it hit? You can't overturn a call like that, there definitely wasn't evidence saying he didn't catch it, especially saying the original ruling was a completion.



It's not tainted in anyway, you just fail to believe your Bungals can lose. Your not going win many games kicking Field Goals and having one of the worst defenses, if not the worst in the NFL. Please show me without a doubt that ball was incomplete, because who is to say his left hand was not on the ball when he fell with it? Regardless, we won by 11, not 7.

It's funny how I get told I have no football knowledge when I make comments people can view as incorrect, but when someone makes a comment like that that's obviously incorrect, it's ok and they have plenty of football knowledge.

Where do I start? The incomplete pass? Good idea. You can see half of the ball on the replay, his other hand's not under it, so he trapped it if anything, because the ball was moving around, and neither hand was under it, so he didn't have control. So, WITHOUT EVEN A REASONABLE DOUBT, it was incomplete.

Now the biggest flaw in football knowledge: that was the Steelers first score, and if you take that away, nothing in that game would have gone the same way, and I mean NOTHING. How could you even think the game would have gone the exact same way? Please explain that to me.