Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bengals Run D (specifically backers)
#7
Pretty sure we are staying with the 4-3. We shall see I guess. But with all the talk about how bad the Bengals run D was, we obviously needed to add some players, but the tackling was terrible. Getting to the ball carrier wasn't a big deal. But bringing him down was. I think tackling is a lot attitude, just like rebounding in basketball. When you look around the league, all the good defenses have one thing in common, they tackle well. I think you will agree that too many times last year, there were too many yards gained after initial contact was made. I think Dexter Jackson tried to light an emotional fire under those guys. I remember him calling people out for a lack of effort. Maybe some of these new players can not only bring some talent and depth, but a little attitude as well.
Messages In This Thread
Bengals Run D (specifically backers) - by BFritz - 05-05-2007, 01:18 AM
Bengals Run D (specifically backers) - by t-cat50 - 05-08-2007, 10:41 PM
Bengals Run D (specifically backers) - by BFritz - 05-09-2007, 12:27 AM
Bengals Run D (specifically backers) - by BFritz - 05-11-2007, 09:52 PM
Bengals Run D (specifically backers) - by Bengal Cat - 05-11-2007, 10:46 PM
Bengals Run D (specifically backers) - by BFritz - 05-12-2007, 12:14 AM
Bengals Run D (specifically backers) - by BFritz - 05-12-2007, 05:19 PM
Bengals Run D (specifically backers) - by BFritz - 05-13-2007, 01:30 AM
Bengals Run D (specifically backers) - by BFritz - 05-13-2007, 06:35 PM
Bengals Run D (specifically backers) - by BFritz - 05-14-2007, 09:47 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)