Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Archaeologists, scholars dispute Jesus documentary
#11
ComfortEagle Wrote:Those of you exclaiming that none of this is true and that nothing in the film is true, I have a question.

Have any of you actually watched the film???
How would these bones and these facts gone 2 thousand years without being found or noticed it they hold evidence of the most well known and important figure in history??

ComfortEagle Wrote:I feel you can't truly discredit the film without watching. It would be like saying, "I don't believe in God." without ever reading the Bible.
Just like I can't truly credit the film right now, as I've only seen certain parts of it.


Jesus was a popular name then, as it is now(more popular today is Hispanic cultures). However, there is also the fact that the probability of this occurring varies. Right now, they are saying that the probability of finding a tomb with all of these names, etc. is 600 to 1.

However, if they include the tomb of James(the brother of Jesus), found very close to this same tomb the probability increases to 1,000,000 to 1.

DNA may help determine whether the two sets of bones were related, furthering support for the case.
Jesus didn't have any brothers.
QB Challenge Champion, Just Pitching Champion, Midi Golf Champion- My Greatest Accomplishments in Life
Messages In This Thread
Archaeologists, scholars dispute Jesus documentary - by BFritz - 03-08-2007, 06:38 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)