Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why not run a 4 guard lineup?
#13
I like the idea of the 4 guard lineup.... Here is another one for thought.....
Morris ©
Orbzut (4) He might at least accidentally get a rebound
Meeks (3)
Bradley (2)
Jasper (1)

That would leave Crawford to spell the 1, 2, 0r 3 spots.

I am also a little disappointed that Porter is playing so little. I know d with him is questionable. But he can handle and shoot. Also Stephenson needs to play more...he is a f and needs the experience. Thomas is a senior (he's not going to get any better)---and PLEASE don't even say the word PERRY to me.
Messages In This Thread
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by torQQue - 02-17-2007, 10:08 PM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by TidesHoss32 - 02-17-2007, 10:16 PM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by cards_athlete - 02-17-2007, 10:21 PM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by TidesHoss32 - 02-17-2007, 10:23 PM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by -STAT- - 02-17-2007, 10:25 PM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by mcfan1 - 02-17-2007, 10:32 PM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by cards_athlete - 02-17-2007, 10:32 PM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by cards_athlete - 02-17-2007, 10:32 PM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by cards_athlete - 02-17-2007, 10:35 PM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by firetubbyplease! - 02-17-2007, 11:52 PM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by -STAT- - 02-18-2007, 12:26 AM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by cards_athlete - 02-18-2007, 03:33 AM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by BlackcatAlum - 02-18-2007, 03:58 AM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by Statmaster - 02-18-2007, 06:37 AM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by Statmaster - 02-18-2007, 04:47 PM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by cards_athlete - 02-18-2007, 07:26 PM
Why not run a 4 guard lineup? - by Playboy5 - 02-18-2007, 09:47 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)