Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66
#27
I really don't have a dog on this tree but Pburg had just about as much fight in them as my wife's 17 year old 3 legged housecat.No perimeter defense and the body language,wow.. Not saying they would have beat Martin co but they sure as hell were not with that effort...
That said the Im not sure the refs cared either... A lot of childish posturing from both teams.. I expect some ego and jackjawing, that's fine, but much of this was not that, it was kinda childish... Im really surprised the refs let it go on like they did....
Congrats to Martin co, they lit it up and got the win..
Messages In This Thread
Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66 - by Spud - 01-15-2025, 11:15 PM
RE: Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66 - by BCF4L - 01-15-2025, 11:17 PM
RE: Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66 - by BCF4L - 01-15-2025, 11:20 PM
RE: Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66 - by Spud - 01-15-2025, 11:30 PM
RE: Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66 - by BCF4L - 01-15-2025, 11:34 PM
RE: Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66 - by BCF4L - 01-15-2025, 11:46 PM
RE: Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66 - by BCF4L - 01-15-2025, 11:47 PM
RE: Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66 - by BCF4L - 01-15-2025, 11:55 PM
RE: Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66 - by BCF4L - 01-16-2025, 12:03 AM
RE: Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66 - by Quincy - 01-16-2025, 12:23 AM
RE: Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66 - by Spud - 01-15-2025, 11:28 PM
RE: Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66 - by BCF4L - 01-16-2025, 12:05 AM
RE: Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66 - by Blacksmith - 01-16-2025, 01:48 AM
RE: Martin County 87 Prestonsburg 66 - by -STAT- - 01-16-2025, 10:26 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)