Thread Rating:
(Yesterday, 05:53 PM)i82much Wrote:(Yesterday, 04:49 PM)HOOPFAN Wrote: BC got exactly what Fleming received. The same exact refs called these games. Even the girls games. It was very obvious in the girls game who was going to dictate the outcome. The same with the boys game. Fleming got it as well. It is a very bad look on Rowan in my opinion to host teams and then play 8 on 5.
Nothing to take away from the girls and boys of Rowan. The kids played hard. They just had help.
Not sure who the third official was but the other two I believe were Sutton and Harris. Two of the most respected officials in Kentucky. I know both personally and they are perfect examples of what high school officials should be. Do they miss calls? Of course. Do they have bias towards one team or another? No way. Boyd simply got outplayed. Own it and you can repair it. Deny it and nothing changes.
Because you know them personally and it coming from you does not help the bias they showed in those games. It dictates outcomes. Ask Fleming as well BC.
(Yesterday, 07:34 PM)16BBall Fan Wrote: I watched the game the reason Boyd lost was not due to the officials it boils down to if Spurlock and Hicks are not shooting really well or getting up a lot of shots from 3 they are just an average team. Spurlock was held 7 points below his average and Hicks was just 3-7 from 3 and only had 9 points. The Vikings did a good job of making Spurlock and Hicks work for every shot the got. These two teams play again in just 8 days once again at Rowan Co.
I watched the game as well. They let Rowan foul and called tic tacs on BC. I will agree Boyd didn’t play great but as a whole shot well. Spur 5/10 and Rardon 7/10 from 3 and 44% as a team. 23pts for Spur and 22 for Rardon. The difference in the game was the foul line. Look who shot more. The girls game was the same way. The Fleming game as well.
Messages In This Thread
Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by Fanman - 01-13-2025, 11:22 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by DingspitzBlubberbean - Yesterday, 02:26 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by HOOPFAN - Yesterday, 04:49 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by i82much - Yesterday, 05:53 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by Ky1976 - Yesterday, 07:11 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by HOOPFAN - Yesterday, 07:42 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by i82much - Yesterday, 08:41 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by HOOPFAN - Yesterday, 10:01 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by i82much - Yesterday, 10:17 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by TribeTime - Yesterday, 06:15 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by Ky1976 - Yesterday, 05:18 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by HOOPFAN - Yesterday, 07:33 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by 16BBall Fan - Yesterday, 07:34 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by Fanman - Yesterday, 10:21 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by HOOPFAN - 6 hours ago
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by Ky1976 - 4 hours ago
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by HOOPFAN - 4 hours ago
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by Ky1976 - 4 hours ago
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by HOOPFAN - 1 hour ago
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by Ky1976 - 1 hour ago
Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by 16BBall Fan - 01-13-2025, 11:23 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by Fanman - 01-13-2025, 11:39 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by i82much - Yesterday, 12:47 AM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by Ky1976 - Yesterday, 09:48 AM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by i82much - Yesterday, 11:03 AM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by Appalachian Cat - Yesterday, 12:30 PM
RE: Rowan County 65 Boyd County 61 - by 4 Quarters - Yesterday, 12:50 PM
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)