[Hoot Gibson]

Vance gave the Harris campaign a lot of ammunition during his Rogan interview.

I am sure that it will be devastating. When a campaign has to resort to parsing sentences from a three hour interview to make campaign ads, then you know they are desperate. Most people respect candidates who actually answer questions and defend their own policies. Are you not the least bit curious how Kamala Harris would perform in a similar interview? Or do you know what most people do, that such an interview would get ugly fast? She is ill equipped to carry on an intelligent conversation.

I don't believe that Harris would fare very well either.  Number one, she doesn't answer tough questions very well, tending to reply with stock remarks, and number two, she is not adept on lying on the fly like some other politicians.  

Vances's mistake was thinking that Rogan would go as easy on him as he did Trump, believing that he was in friendly territory and therefore not being prepared as well as he should have been.

I watched the entire Vance interview, as well as the Trump interview. Vance did exceptionally well. A Rogan interview is not something that requires preparation. Either you know how to present yourself or you don't. Kamala is too shallow to do well in that kind of setting. Walz would do better than Kamala would, IMO, but we will never know because neither one of them will ever do a long interview with Rogan.