[Hoot Gibson]

What a cult leader does is divide into us vs. them, then make the other side evil.  Then keep feeding his followers that message until it weaponizes your side.  Who does this sound like? 
Trump is arguably the most divisive figure in the US in at least the last 50 years or more.

That is a very biased view of cults. The Biden administration has weaponized the federal government and used lawfare in a failed attempt to force Trump to withdraw from the campaign. I don't dispute the fact that Trump is a polarizing figure, but he did not use government resources to suppress evidence in criminal investigations, nor did he attempt to use the power of the presidency to intimidate political opponents from running against him. That is the deplorable record of the Biden administration.

I am not sure that I would call Democrat followers cult members, because I believe that most Democrats know that they are responsible for electing a senile old man to the presidency and that they are responsible for him still serving in that office, despite their own party admitting that he was not fit to be a candidate for the same office.

You can argue that Trump is the most divisive figure in the past 50 years, but I think that there is a better argument to make that the Democrat Party consists of a large collection of polarizing figures, which including party activists in the national media, is far more responsible for polarizing the American electorate than any single individual could ever do.

There you go again duck, dodge, and spin you are in the cult but want to play both sides of the fence. All you have to do is read the briefs or transcripts that have been made public and tell me where 1 DEMOCRAT has testified under oath anywhere about your Dear Leader. They have all been people who worked for YOUR Dear Leader or people who was close to him. Jet has more integrity than you at least he admits he is a Cult, but you want to play both sides Party over Country.

You are way off topic and, as a troll, you have contributed nothing to the discussion of the thread topic. Even the member name that you chose for yourself, "Maga Nuts" is a feeble attempt to troll. The government prosecutors who have filed criminal charges against Trump are Democrats, the judges are Democrats, and most of the juries will be Democrats. Why? Because Democrats brought charges against Trump in heavily Democrat areas in courts packed with liberal judges. Why would I read through thousands of pages of legal briefs and transcripts looking for Democrat witnesses? I would have to be a total idiot to do so. Have you read thousands of pages of transcripts related to the Trump witch hunt? Or are you simply regurgitating what you have read in whatever left-wing media sources that you use to stay "informed?"

Correct me if I am wrong, but you have not posted anything positive about Joe Biden or Kamala Harris in this thread, only anti-Trump propaganda. Is it safe to say that you will be voting against Donald Trump and only voting for Harris as the lesser of two evils in your mind? Or do you see Harris as a great candidate who has positively earned your support? If the latter is true, then it seems like you would be posting her virtues here instead of confirming the suspicion that you are here to troll.

Hell has frozen over finally got a half a$$ answer from you.
You just admit you don't want to know the TRUTH that's why you won't read the indictments welcome to the MAGA CULT hoot Party over Country that's your motto.

What a tool!   Based on your criteria that anybody who does not personally read thousands of pages of legal briefs and transcripts related to the politically motivated prosecutions of Donald Trump is a member of a cult, then 99+ percent of American citizens are cult members. It is obvious that you have not read those documents and you still have not posted anything relevant to the thread topic. You are incapable of maintaining your train of thought from one post to the next. You first accuse me of not reading legal briefs and transcripts and now you are using the term "indictments." An indictment would not include details about witnesses' political affiliations. Not that you asked me, but I would also not waste my time reading indictments, written by Democrat prosecutors, against Trump.

The truth is that no rational American actually believes that Trump would have been criminally prosecuted had he announced his retirement from politics prior to the ridiculous impeachment that followed the end of his term. If you say that the prosecutions were not related to his intention of running for a second term, then you will lose even more credibility - if that is even possible for a serial troll.