Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pulaski County 42 North Laurel 14
#10
(10-12-2024, 05:34 PM)plantmanky Wrote: Im trying to figure out why you guys thing Pulaski Co is being disrespected?

They have 3 losses, 2 of them are to average teams in their class and games they should have won. 

Lets look at the 5A Rankings
Class 5A

1. Bowling Green (6-1)
2. Cooper (7-0)
3. Highlands (5-2)
4. South Warren (5-1)
5. South Oldham (6-1)
6. Owensboro (4-3)
7. Scott County (4-3)
8. Woodford County (5-1)
9. Conner (5-2)
10. Pulaski County (3-3)


I would say Pulaski should be ahead of Conner, I think they beat them if played, but other than that, there isnt one team above that that I say, Yeah Pulaski beats them for sure. 


Lets look at Mountain Rankings
1. Corbin (5-1)
2. Johnson Central (5-2)
3. Belfry (5-2)
4. Bell County (6-1)
5. Rockcastle County (6-1)
6. Prestonsburg (7-0)
7. Pulaski County (3-3)
8. Clay County (4-1)
9. Perry Central (4-2)
10. Hazard (4-3)

Pulaski I would think beat Prestonsburg, other than that there are no for sure wins I see. 

Pulaski is ranked right where they should be, they should win their district and be the #1 seed going into their sister district matchups.

***************************************************
I wasn't insinuating they were overlooked, very well could be they are simply coming on at the right time
in the season, and going to be a tuff competitor now.  It happens all the time, a team learns a lot as the season
progresses and they get where they need to be come play off time.   I see that playing out with this team.  
Messages In This Thread
RE: Pulaski County 42 North Laurel 14 - by Hi Risk Warrior - 10-12-2024, 05:55 PM
RE: Pulaski County 42 North Laurel 14 - by CRK1 - 10-13-2024, 09:15 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)