Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Garrard County 35 Somerset 28
#23
(09-18-2024, 11:35 AM)M00sejaw64 Wrote:
(09-17-2024, 10:47 PM)Waitaminute Wrote: They just better hope they beat Breathitt and finish first in that district. If not they’ll get clock ran second round at Beechwood. Being paired with a weak sister district is what they have going for them.

(09-17-2024, 05:10 PM)DangerMouse Wrote: Makes sense. Pc FaN ^

I watched them drive up here when Lincoln was bad and kick their tails. Beats no one, brags about how good they are. Then talks smack about Somerset and Southwestern because the chest is out because it feels good to them.

Easy to find a mile away. Its a recipe that never fails.

I can objectively look and see which teams it’s trending up for and which it’s down for. Somerset is about to be 2-3 with a pretty weak schedule to start the year with. Campbellsville may run clock.
At the end of the day I know for a fact PC wants Somerset on their schedule every year just like old times no matter what talent they have. It was a great game to look forward to for the community. And now calling it like I see it, ever since PC during the mid-late Hines era started a winning trend that game has been crickets. Then all that’s left is both teams talkin smack, but I think the whole county knows the programs have flipped positions since their start. Respectively.

That's probably a little premature. Pulaski seems to be back on the rise and there is excitement around the program. That said, they were 4-8 last year while Somerset made the semi-finals, and Somerset also has the more recent title. Looking at this season alone it definitely appears that Pulaski is the better team, but we're talking about a 2-1 and 2-2 team.

Regardless, I wish they would all get these series going again. It's easy to say whenever your team is top dog that the reason the series isn't played is because the other side is scared, but in reality it all started with contract disputes and for some reason they still have never (or have never attempted) to figure it out. Basically Somerset wanted to keep the Correll Bowl where the games would always be at Somerset (due to capacity IIRC, parking about 2x and seating about 3x at Somerset v. Pulaski/SW), but Pulaski and Southwestern wanted it to rotate.

I think all schools will continue to improve if they can hold onto their coaches. Having three young quality coaches in the same town should elevate the level of play in the entire area.
Messages In This Thread
Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by Bull got out! - 09-13-2024, 11:00 PM
RE: Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by papagrit - 09-14-2024, 12:16 AM
RE: Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by BEChargers - 09-14-2024, 02:26 AM
RE: Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by jumper1 - 09-14-2024, 11:36 AM
RE: Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by Patriot1 - 09-14-2024, 01:32 PM
RE: Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by jetpilot - 09-14-2024, 06:22 PM
RE: Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by jumper1 - 09-16-2024, 04:25 PM
RE: Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by Medusa - 09-17-2024, 09:04 PM
RE: Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by M00sejaw64 - 09-18-2024, 11:35 AM
RE: Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by Shogun - 09-18-2024, 03:36 PM
RE: Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by M00sejaw64 - 09-18-2024, 04:20 PM
RE: Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by M00sejaw64 - 09-19-2024, 10:37 AM
RE: Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by M00sejaw64 - 09-18-2024, 06:29 PM
RE: Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by Medusa - 09-19-2024, 11:02 AM
RE: Garrard County 35 Somerset 28 - by jumper1 - 09-19-2024, 03:05 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)