Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
North Laurel 73 Clay County 69
#12
Clay Co. has the following problems IMO:

1: For whatever reason Jones plays way to many players in the rotation.
2: They have no consistent shooting from anyone
3: They have no leader on that team period
4: IMO Clay made a bad hire when they went with Jones and not someone who these players had some relationships with in Hibbard.

I said it at the start of the season......Clay Co. will be lucky to beat Jackson Co. in the district 1st round if the Summers kid comes back to play for Jackson this year and when they played them at Clay earlier this year a JC parent said he was out 6 weeks so he will be back.
Messages In This Thread
North Laurel 73 Clay County 69 - by Cactus Jack - 01-05-2024, 10:51 PM
RE: North Laurel 73 Clay County 69 - by Hazard417 - 01-06-2024, 12:24 AM
RE: North Laurel 73 Clay County 69 - by Bigdog88 - 01-06-2024, 01:12 AM
RE: North Laurel 73 Clay County 69 - by 13th - 01-06-2024, 02:53 PM
RE: North Laurel 73 Clay County 69 - by Cowboy42 - 01-07-2024, 02:22 AM
RE: North Laurel 73 Clay County 69 - by UKCC - 01-06-2024, 01:20 AM
RE: North Laurel 73 Clay County 69 - by cchsfan4life - 01-07-2024, 02:11 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)