[vector#1]

LOL, typing at the same time. ^^

My comment apparently flew right over your heads.

So your statement declaring your lack of understanding of the matter at hand, causes you to sort of stay out of it. Yet you align yourself with vector (whose on-line persona to date, would have required him to have had a brain transplant to have written the surprisingly lucid post in the first place).

But in your professed shortfall and inexplicable agreement with vector, we are to feel put upon intellectually as if we are the ones who don't get it? Let me think about that one for a few minutes.

Nevermind guys, I apologize if it came off as an intellectual cut.  That wasn't really my intent, well not this time anyway.

My response was not intended as a cut either, at least not one directed at you. I took some time to articulate why, when you stand with vector, you are putting yourself on slippery footing. Trump did nothing that any other candidate of either party would have done, had they been convinced that the election had been rigged and stolen from them. Those who agree that the election was stolen numbers in the tens of millions, so to dismiss all of us as kooks without taking time to understand the issues that Trump and his allies raised is very short sighted, IMO.

To simply repeat that no court ever found the evidence presented convincing, when nearly all of the cases were decided on the basis of a lack of standing, as vector and his two sidekicks have done for months, is very disingenuous. As courts have examined the evidence presented, as has they have done in Michigan, Georgia, and New Hampshire, they have found enough issues to allow lawsuits and audits to proceed. In response, Democrats have attempted to discredit the limited forensic audits that have been done by disparaging the character of the auditors.

Quooter we have never had a President do what your Dear Leader done and still doing. Theirs nothing to compare this to except maybe Jefferson Davis who declared war on the United States.