[Cardfan1]

Democrats don't want to ID anybody claiming to be Democrat in the first place. They'd count Mickey Mouse and all his progeny. But seriously, you can't figure out on your own that a paper ballot comes in, there is enormous pressure to get the vote tabulated by a certain date to in order to certify the election of the leader of the free world? I don't believe there is time, much less any real way even if the deepstate had the will, to vet a sheet of paper coming from who knows where. If they can't get in trouble for letting illegals through to vote, they'll literally have carte blanche with this.

Our esteemed governor already vetoed Kentucky voter ID on grounds undefined under the law. You really think they're going to do due diligence to validate each of those millions of votes? And I'd take odds on this-- Nationally there were about 130 million votes cast in 2016, many districts that went overwhelmingly Democrat, had vote totals that far exceeded the registered electorate for those individual districts. Nothing odd about that. :please: But I'd bet the mail in tabulation will blow that 130 million mark out of the water, AND turn out to be overwhelmingly Democrat.

So you believe there would be forgeries produced by the deep state?

The gov. Vetoed that bill because you can’t get in a courthouse to get an ID right now.

How many voter impersonation cases happen a year in KY?

I’ll need some real numbers on that scenario you cited. Something real, not a blog.

Again 5 states already do this. Some have been carried by Republicans.

All this tells me you are ok with allowing voter suppression over a low chance of fraud.