[TheRealThing]

1. The original tweet was extremely misleading. It’s taken you days of work to explicate the meaning. My guess it was purposefully vague.
2. Math still doesn’t work out from the articles you posted. Not to mention heavily manipulated studies especially the one on Fox News that only counted the “Special Reports.” The extremely conservative biased MRC nitpicked the “evaluative” comments as positive or negative. I call misleading.
3. Of course if 96% were saying these things maybe it’s time to look in the mirror.

Like so may things you post on here, the only tweet involved here is the one which is evidently bouncing around in your head. There was NO tweet on which the percentage was based. It was just to prove the number came from the news media community. You posted a chart generated by the very lying media you always defend on here, in which they give themselves, top billing for honesty. :please:

Jet's point was simply and plainly enough put; the negative media coverage of this President has been north of 95%. And there are tons of corroborative souces out there. But then along comes the Cardfan who thinks he is clever enough to in real time, revise the conversation as hinging somehow on a tweet. Wrong. But keep lying to yourself, it is a clinic in projection, bias, denial and revisionist blather.