[Cardfan1]

:hilarious: Have you at least offered your advisor services to MR Paul? I know I hang on every word. Everybody in the known universe knows the identity of the whistleblower-not.

You proceed as do all La-La Libs from a completely false premise. Everybody knows you guys think debate means to firmly stand your ground, while you revise, repackage, rename, redefine, repurpose and restate in self righteous posturing, your same old positions until the enemy is subdued. That is unless libs have enough liberal activist judges in their pocket. In that case they merely legislate conservatives into submission. Other than Mitt Romney and Susan Collins and one or two other RINO's, nobody's buying that drivel anymore.

So your contentions which assume the fake impeachment would ever be accepted as valid by lucid folks, or that IF Republicans bowed to desperate Dems, and gave them everything they want in the effort to somehow gain the Dem's seal of approval, then the animosity in Congress would all clear up. Which of course is absurd on it's face. But allowing Dems to define every issue, the motives and the performance of Republicans is exactly what has gone on in DC for decades now. Not to mention the way libs openly declare what 'Americans' want all the time, a particularly annoying tack in my book. But oh glorious revelation, Republicans have finally said enough.

Drip away, we're good. :Thumbs:

When Chief Justice John Roberts wouldn't read his question 2 days in a row, that's all I need to know about the legality of what Senator Paul is trying. Maybe his optometry studies made him an expert in Whistleblower laws.

I agree. Drip away. Welcome to "HRC emails" 2020.

I do find it odd this was all about investigating the Bidens. Here is a chance to put them under oath and damage them and Senate Republicans and the Trump administration balks. Odd tactic unless it was just a conspiracy theory all along.