[Cardfan1]

You deal with Iran and any other military threat with the US military. That is unless you're too scared to live free.

But who are you supposedly convincing here with all this baloney? It certainly wouldn't be me, or Seger, or jetpilot, or Hoot Gibson. There are those who formulate their own opinion based on factual observations. And then there are those such as yourself who parrot talking points and get their opinions handed to them. People like you my friend are the Dem's best friend. And I'm not buying for the first second that your sources are not ALL liberal.

The fact is I do listen to the leftist media and the Dems (until an overwhelming urge to throw up starts to wash over) because I want to hear them declare themselves. And may I say that I am never surprised by their outrageous and immoral blather.

The House case might have been a piecemeal compilation of fabrications based on what if's and conspiracies, and lacking in polished transitory linkages. And the Senate presentation may have in fact included a more polished and seamless progression through said fabrication. The whole thing nonetheless runs in direct contravention to the facts of the case.

Soap operas depict characters who dress and live impeccably superficial lifestyles. Thus the greater the offender, the better he would want his appearance to be. In other words if you're going to act like a social Vlad the Impaler, you would want to dress up in the best suits. But even gas station attendant's appearance is always flawless. That was Schiff and Nadler's attempt. Polished as possible, just not the truth. Nobody with an ounce of discretion was fooled by either version of the play. Just as nobody is fooled by your interpretive prowess where the US Constitution is concerned.

The impeachment, like the endless investigations shamelessly and unabashedly called for by Maxine Waters and Al Green, is a farcical vendetta based in lies. And is therefore illegal. But keep your fingers crossed, and earnestly dream on. :Thumbs:

Scared to leave free? Iran threatening the Freedom of the USA is hyperbole and fear-mongering.
Now if you defend the policies it all has to do with interests in the region; not the freedom of the US citizens.

I like participating in discussions rather than just yelling into a vacuum. I’m sorry if you’re offended. I was under the assumption this was a discussion board for all political opinions not just those that lie in the far right conservative wing of the political spectrum.

What facts are a contravention?
TBH you haven’t discussed the facts in this thread.

You have done what the president’s most ardent supporters have done which is complain about the process, which has followed the Constitution. As far as lacking representation from the president’s side, that was his choice.

It’s a good thing the president doesn’t need a strong representation or case, because if the first hour of his defense is any indication.