[TheRealThing]

So what does Mitch ending the circus mean?

Actually, I said the accusations are similar. You are correct the Trump impeachment is moving along faster, whereas the Clinton and Nixon impeachments were much slower investigations. I imagine that can be contributed to politics, elections, and the speed of today's information cycle.

In the emails released just yesterday, govt officials (political and merit) felt the president was in violation of the law by withholding the aid to Ukraine , and linking the decisions directly to the president. The longer this goes the more drip, drip, drip information we will receive.

That foreign policy argument is blurry, because the executive branch is required to follow the spending requirements established by Congress. Several presidents have had their foreign policy decisions questioned and even investigated by Congress.

I was just amused that the president's supporters are clamoring Hillary Clinton's impeachment precedents.

I'm sorry to disappoint, but I don't really fit in the box you are trying to stick me in, but continue on since it's the way in America these days. Little discussion about substance more about partisan lines.

First line answer is abundantly self evident.

No actually in typically deceptive terms, Dems are attempting to give their own sham impeachment the appearance of validity by using certain general facets of the Nixon impeachment as a backdrop. Using that blank canvas they've used results from the conspiracy theory contrived Schiff Show to paint the most damning picture against the President that they could. Problems, none of the charges are true, no fact witnesses.

Didn't say a word about the speed at which the shenanigans have been accomplished in the post you referenced. But the info cycle be darned, the speed was due to the fact that Schiff and Nadler were willing to steamroll due process.

As to your referenced governmental officials, it is no harder to get any number of well placed liberals in government to oppose this duly elected President on matters that might well lead to tremendous harm befalling the US, than it has been to find liberal judges willing to block this President's efforts on immigration and ultimately border security. They'll say anything.

No the foreign policy argument isn't blurry at all. If the Executive had to check with those bozos every time a crisis blew up, or even on matters that were not urgent, the Congress would in effect have total rule as 2/3 of the federal government would be under their control. It don't work that way in the United States.

Don't try to fly that 'little substance' jab by me. You and your's have less than nothing to support the whole shameful ordeal. :please: