[Cardfan1]

LOL, you just can't help it can you? I said Republicans far more closely adhere to the constitution. Never said all.

Of course the Nixon impeachment initially went down party lines. At the outset all it was, was eavesdropping. The lying and cover-up, (to a viable and honorable acting intel community and the congressional investigative effort) is what got them. Notwithstanding, MR Nixon et-al were extended full rights to council, discovery, and a full defense from the get-go. These were and are being denied the President, and Mitch will end the circus which is what rabid libs are so tore up about. So no, the two impeachments look nothing alike. And for the nth time, the Constitution AND the foreign policy records of his 44 predecessors visit the power to conduct foreign policy in the best interests of this nation to President Trump's hands.Trump has in no way violated that tradition.

As to Hill and Bill, Google is a wonderful ally is it not? Doesn't have the first thing to do with this conversation. But does belie your willingness to accept any lie told about the President. And of course the fact that if a Dem says it, even if the evidence take one in an entirely different direction, you're still fine with it.

Finally since the days of JFK, (we'd have a nuclear Cuba to deal with right now if your ilk had anything to do with the way he handled that) I will put the record of the Republicans up against your side's record of special interest goofiness with pride. But let's at least be honest about the Dems and Republicans. Whatever Dems were in 1960, they became something else upon LBJ's unfortunate appointment. You guys bear no faint similarity to the Democrat part of my youth. Unfortunately it's true, a little yeast will cause the whole lump to rise, and the same cancer which has the Dem side of the conference at stage 4 has begun it's relentless encroachment on the Republicans too. However, there are still enough constitution defenders lurking amongst them so as to ensure my continued vote.

So what does Mitch ending the circus mean?

Actually, I said the accusations are similar. You are correct the Trump impeachment is moving along faster, whereas the Clinton and Nixon impeachments were much slower investigations. I imagine that can be contributed to politics, elections, and the speed of today's information cycle.

In the emails released just yesterday, govt officials (political and merit) felt the president was in violation of the law by withholding the aid to Ukraine , and linking the decisions directly to the president. The longer this goes the more drip, drip, drip information we will receive.

That foreign policy argument is blurry, because the executive branch is required to follow the spending requirements established by Congress. Several presidents have had their foreign policy decisions questioned and even investigated by Congress.

I was just amused that the president's supporters are clamoring Hillary Clinton's impeachment precedents.

I'm sorry to disappoint, but I don't really fit in the box you are trying to stick me in, but continue on since it's the way in America these days. Little discussion about substance more about partisan lines.