[jetpilot]

I never said or implied that Trump should pick somebody neutral to be the new AG. He never picked neutral SC nominees, but he also did not nominate obvious political hacks.

Holder was a hack. Lynch was a hack. Reno was a hack. The last thing Trump should do is to nominate somebody who even Republicans will see as a Trump "wing man." All he needs is an honest, competent, articulate AG who will be dedicated to restoring it to an agency that will work to bring justice to all Americans. For Trump, that would result in an end to political witch hunts by his own DoJ. For Hillary Clinton, that would hopefully mean a real criminal investigation into her real crimes and a prison cell before her poor health allows her to escape accountability for her crimes.

What part of that proposal does not make sense to you? Do you think he should appoint somebody like Chris Christie or Rudy Giuliani to the position? Somebody who cannot be confirmed without suspending or eliminating the current rules of the Senate?

Rep John Ratcliffe is my pick. But to be clear the last thing I am worried about is what Dems and media think. They are going to have the same narrative no matter what, so be sure to get the guy you want in there.