[TheRealThing]

^^ Agreed. One majorly damaging Democrat narrative during the George W Bush administration was to say that Bush lied to the Congress to get them to okie doke the Iraq Resolution. I have always said that if that were true, somebody would have stepped forward, (certainly by this point) to rat W out. One just cannot keep the lid on something that significant in the DC swamp. But it has not happened because it was not true.

Enter, as case in point, one Donna Brazile. The rats are the ones who always wind up getting burned when things go south in a corrupt administration be they associated with the DNC, or the Presidency, or the Congress. And just as dependably, it is always those 'rats' who've the most to tell. We the people have by virtue of common sense known the truth all along. But since getting public officials to admit to their shenanigans is a nearly impossible proposition, until the recent revelations where Brazile, Podesta, and Wasserman-Schultz are concerned came to light, there was no so-called proof. My interpretation of proof BTW, is not the courtroom variety of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Applying that standard to the public domain was the brain child of lawyers Bill and Hill, and is the adoptive tactic of certain politicians rich enough and driven enough to hire other big gun lawyers to see things through for them. I mean, has anybody else noticed that most issues of legislation all have a litany of case law and law suits attached?

At any rate, as the rats feel the pressure we can look for more revelations and confessions as time goes by. Not the least of which was the Steele dossier or the recent admission to certain agencies having wire tapped Trump Tower. And you can bet the barrel of the Russian collusion gun will wind up pointing at somebody other than DJT.