[TheRealThing]

Going try this again without someone deleting my POSTS

Now REMBER this comes from Fox News the holy word for the right now keep in mind if capable that this is Donald's DOJ

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/...apped.html

As far as Nunes claim of Rice unmasking Donald's close friends

Again from Fox News the holy word for the right and the Rights Chief Investigator Trey Gowdy

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/09/14/su...d-good-job

The reason Rush was brought up about Donald's tweet Obama wiretapping Trump Tower was Rush has a good reason for THROWING OUT CONSPIRACY

Rush Limbaugh net worth and salary: Rush Limbaugh is an American conservative radio host and media personality who has a net worth of $550 million. Rush Limbaugh is one of the most popular and highly compensated radio talk show hosts in the world. He earns an annual salary north of $85 million

Conspiracy Just makes RUSH RICHER IF HE CAN FIND FOOLS TO BELIEVE HIM

And as far as Carter Page goes alleged fisa warrant was obtained by the FBI not Obama or anything doing with wiretapping Donald's Phones here is the Tweets from Donald


#1. Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!

#2. Is it legal for a sitting President to be "wire tapping" a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW!

#3 I'd bet a good lawyer could make a great case out of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just prior to Election!

#4 How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate.

All has been proven LIES

As far as my post about the moderator your answer proves my point


Oh dear!! Could Obama be "the next one"???

Can you say Obamagate???

I'm going to try this again. Calling electronic eavesdropping wiretapping, is just like calling all facial tissue Kleenex. It's a colloquialism generic to the art of surveillance, and as such has been proven to be 100% accurate and applicable to the situation. Now I grant you, making such a generalization would not exactly get one an A for his college level dissertation. But in the case of conversation to regular folds, it was entirely appropriate. Intelligence agencies of the United States of America, gathered information on Donald J Trump and his campaign staff. They listened in on everybody's phone conversations associated in any way with MR Trump to include even, his family. They intercepted emails. They snooped and investigated to the best of their collective abilities, and managed to dredge up absolutely nothing with which to besmirch the President.

Can you say willfully ignorant?