Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Democratic Party diversity
#37
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Here's just the issue: you can't hear anything but your own voice, echoed only by source material that reinforces you own view of yourself as Chief Peacock.

1) Obviously, since you offer no counter, you see little difference between the church and state. Further, you apparently believe Franklin, Jefferson conceived of this nation as an officially sanctioned functionary of the Church. Wrong.

2) Now, Christians enjoy tremendous freedom in the United States, and Christianity is the unofficial "I'm Proud to be an American" go to religion, but that's not enough for you.

You are a revisionist. You are wrong. And no amount of peacockian screeching and strutting around changes that.




Well, at least I enjoy the notable distinction of only having the one voice to listen to, not "voices" such as in your case. I imagine it gets to be quite an argument up there occasionally n the old Sombrero cabeza?

Like I said, you can't even make a post without using the thoughts and inflections of other posters to communicate. And I've got your number. You love evil and you spend all your time in defense of it. Therefore every post you make is full of false assertions built on false premises. In short, you lie.

1) I have written extensively on the absurdity of separation of Church and state. It's a pinheaded talking point for you, on which you cannot even mount a respectable argument. For the last time, I am in no way confused about whether or not this nation was ever intended to be a theocracy. The government was however, always intended to protect the Church. More than two hundred years of go by and you morons appear, trying to say government is to be protected from the Church. (At this point many times, I might have put in a one word rebuff.... " Wrong." But as with everything else, you've recently taken to copying that practice too.) News flash there bozo, there exists something called the historical record, therefore everybody of average reading acumen knows who the revisionists really are. The government of the United States does not recognize a national religion. It does however, recognize the existence of only One Creator, Nature's God, by Whom all of men's unalienable rights are bestowed. In the clear light of reason, reasonable men do not deny the existence of God, rendering your argument against Him unreasonable. And our system of law is based on His Word. We Americans are inextricably interfaced therefore with the precepts of God and that's why the founding documents are full of references to that end. Deal with it, (at least till The Lord comes for His Church). After we're gone, then you can have your godless heyday. At that point you can revise the Constitution out of existence if you want.

I do not believe, (nor did I mention Franklin BTW,) that Washington, Jefferson, Eisenhower or Reagan were in any way confused on the subject either, nor was Sir Edmund Burke who clearly had great influence on the founders. We are not Israel and you cannot name a single notable from American history, or the present, who advocated anything like your asinine and oft parroted lie in which you claim people are trying to merge the Church and the state. Which claim BTW is the left's and your justification for pushing America into a moral abyss, as if men are too stupid to discern right from wrong. You're certainly not fooling anybody by dressing your Satanic assertions up in the clothes of a patriot or in the sheep's clothing of the body of Christ. From where I stand you are robeless pal.

Therefore the only thing which is OBVIOUS in your blatherskiting rant is your true heartfelt affiliation. You've not made the first argument in support of God's Church or anything that He advocates for in the lives of his children at any point on this forum. And, none of your distortions and misinterpretations of Scripture, or history 'changes that.'

2) Now, (another favored word use from among my writing tools that you just cannot lay off of) you're WRONG again about what is enough for me. I take my solace and guidance from the Church. And though I realize your career aspirations are to be satisfied playing your liberal music on the deck of history's Titanic, I am not about to just lay down and let the black waters of sin's dread sway overtake the portholes of our ship of state without so much as a whimper. I intend to call out sin for what it is, as is my charge. It is God's Church which is the salt and light of eternal consequence, not some interloping advocate for all manner of sin and compromise who goes by the name Sombrero. And I will fulfill my charge to oppose it in every quarter as I see fit until The Lord calls me home. And let's get real here, if you were on the same team, you'd be on my side on the things I write about. Not my nemesis. "By their fruit shall you know them," your fruit (on here) is rotten to the core. "The devils believe and tremble," I guarantee some of the most Scripturally adept creatures that God ever made are his angels, Satan being the most glorious of all. He led a great rebellion in heaven and was cast out to plague mankind. Any demon from hell can quote Scripture till there ain't no tomorrow. In fact, I would think some of them know every last word in the Bible and more. It would take a lot more than misquotes and misinterpretations to impress me.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Messages In This Thread
Democratic Party diversity - by WideRight05 - 08-16-2017, 06:45 PM
Democratic Party diversity - by Granny Bear - 08-16-2017, 06:59 PM
Democratic Party diversity - by vector - 08-16-2017, 09:48 PM
Democratic Party diversity - by WideRight05 - 08-16-2017, 10:05 PM
Democratic Party diversity - by Granny Bear - 08-17-2017, 12:41 AM
Democratic Party diversity - by vector - 08-17-2017, 01:36 AM
Democratic Party diversity - by WideRight05 - 08-17-2017, 03:10 AM
Democratic Party diversity - by Granny Bear - 08-17-2017, 01:38 PM
Democratic Party diversity - by Pick6 - 08-17-2017, 02:49 PM
Democratic Party diversity - by TheRealThing - 08-17-2017, 05:41 PM
Democratic Party diversity - by TheRealThing - 08-17-2017, 08:08 PM
Democratic Party diversity - by WideRight05 - 08-18-2017, 12:02 AM
Democratic Party diversity - by ekyswvahsfan - 08-18-2017, 12:30 AM
Democratic Party diversity - by Granny Bear - 08-18-2017, 12:40 AM
Democratic Party diversity - by TheRealThing - 08-18-2017, 12:43 AM
Democratic Party diversity - by TheRealThing - 08-18-2017, 01:03 AM
Democratic Party diversity - by TheRealThing - 08-18-2017, 02:48 AM
Democratic Party diversity - by TheRealThing - 08-18-2017, 03:36 AM
Democratic Party diversity - by TheRealThing - 08-18-2017, 04:10 AM
Democratic Party diversity - by TheRealThing - 08-18-2017, 03:57 PM
Democratic Party diversity - by TheRealThing - 08-18-2017, 05:53 PM
Democratic Party diversity - by TheRealThing - 08-18-2017, 09:15 PM
Democratic Party diversity - by TheRealThing - 08-19-2017, 02:59 AM
Democratic Party diversity - by TheRealThing - 08-19-2017, 03:41 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)