[Bob Seger]

Easy, Bob, now, I realize literalism is probably your "home, home on the range," but what is clear is that Comey was speaking in nuance, as the President was totally ignoring protocol. Now, that may not matter to you, and you may be such a homer that you can't even see it, eh, that's yours to deal with. In days to come, this'll all clear up. By the way, being under investigation doesn't mean guilt: it often means enough evidence exists to pursue, but it doesn't mean guilt.

Further, you may spout "liar" all you want, as you often confuse a disagreement as to facts, as to nuance, as a "lie" vs. the truth. Again, if that helps you, by all means, carry on.

Now that your deflection has been answered, what say you if it turns out that there were no tapes?

Ramblings of someone trying to grasp onto anything, just anything, to avoid admitting what everybody on this forum knows..


That being, a dishonest man who you couldn't beat the truth out of with a ball bat. Commonly know as a liberal.