[The Urban Sombrero]

You are the most partisan and blatantly dishonest participant in this forum and the gap between you and your closest rival in that regard is a wide one. Even now, in light of Comey's disclosure that Loretta Lynch ordered him not to refer to his investigation of Hillary Clinton's deliberate, repeated, and illegal handling of classified information, as an "investigation," you persist in defending her.

I just completed my annual refresher on the handling of sensitive and classified information and I have years of experience working in the federal justice system. What are your qualifications in this area?

At the very least, Hillary Clinton should have been stripped of her security clearance on Day 1 of the Trump administration. The investigation into her corrupt reign as Secretary of State should have started on Day 1 following Jeff Session's confirmation as Attorney General. He could have also launched an investigation into crooked former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort's dealings with the Russian puppet government of Ukraine to send the message that nobody is above the law, regardless of party affiliation or their friends in high places.

If you are correct, and somehow not a partisan, explain the disagreement over Hillary Clinton's culpability (legally) amongst the legal and judicial communities. You can't.

As to "lying," and investigations, and a President telling a former Cabinet member to "stay strong," amongst many other, AT THE LEAST, serious breaches of protocol, we'll see.