[TheRealThing]

I'm trying to change the subject? That's rich. The memos exist. Fact. Comey commited no felony, unless it can be proven that he absolutely was sure that the President was absolutely intent on obstructing justice. This is known as "too high a hurdle" in prosecutorial circles. Comey documented an "unusual" conversation "of note." If a penchant for "white paper" documentation was criminal, Rumsfeld was a by-the-ream convict.

That's just so rich. What a laugh, you poor, step-in-line, partisan-blind friendo.

Well he's got a problem then friendo, because he testified under oath that nobody had pressured him to quash the Flynn investigation. What's the truth, the memo you think you know all about or his testimony? The law says he has to report incidents of obstruction, according to his sworn testimony he had never had that happen "in his experience." And let's get real, the only circle of your acquaintance is the one that spins about a foot away from your ears. But thanks for changing the subject to Rumsfeld and proving my point before you were done talking out of your head.