[The Urban Sombrero]

Unbelievable, you seriously don't understand Paul was speaking on God's behalf to the saved of that day & onward? Therefore since he was speaking of himself and all Christians, the let 'us' do whatever. You don't agree with Scalia because you don't accept his work based on the Christ denying logic of the liberal.

I accept his work for a lot of reasons, but mostly because it doesn't defy the record of our heritage or common sense, but more importantly he did not advocate for that which is unnatural.

Lighten up, Francis. You obviously lack a sense of humor. Now, as to your contention that to defend egalitarian principle, not specific races or genders or behaviors, but principle, is Christ denying: pure poppycock. Do you not understand that advocating for equal protection to extend to all is, historically speaking, an advocacy away from history's atrocities? You believe, I take it, that positing same sex marriage under the auspices of equal protection is impossible for one who truly believes homosexuality misses the mark of God. Further, you believe that, being "unnatural," homosexuality is in a class of sin distinct from adultery and fornication as sexual sin. Because Scalia shared that view, you place him beyond reproach or disagreement. And, if anyone dissents from any of that, he or she denies Christ? Back up the truck, your load of manure might grow the roses, but it won't pass the smell test of history.