[TheRealThing]

If your suggestion is that Romans 1:27 is the basis for law, what of other verses clearly spelling out other sins? You continually ignore that aspect, prance around arms thrust upward like some clown. You believe that equal protection under the law does not extend to same sex marriage. Your basis is Christian belief. However, under your belief, adulterers may marry, murderers may marry, etc. Thus, you create, out of your Christian belief, a special class of people who are not entitled to marry, denied equal protection under the law, and, thereby, deny a right granted all other citizens based on religious conviction. My trouble is finding your ball amidst all the straw. Funny, you keep wanting to posit a show of hands as some test for efficacy of position. If every single member of BGR says same sex marriage is not entitled to equal protection under the law, that proves or settles nothing.

Say what you will, the logic and truth of Romans 1:27 is as undeniable as it is inescapable. I'm not ignoring anything I know of. It is best to address singular issues to provide clarity though, and that is the why of your continuing efforts to blow up a tornado over the stockyard. Self delusion and ignoring the obvious is the liberal's gift, and as I have pointed out to you repeatedly, it was the State that invaded the purview and sanctity of the Church. It has been the Church which has successfully provided right direction for men since the days of Christ, certainly not government. And that relationship was one of the main concerns of the Founders, who recognized that only a moral people can successfully self govern, and who wanted therefore, to give the citizenry of this once great land all the protections they could provide. It is the Church which shines the light on wrong doing. For as God has said, His people (the Christians in this world) represent the preserving properties of' salt and light.' But like those who argue for the nativity to be banned from the public square, wrong hates salt and light and seeks to be shielded from their effects. Hence 'the wall' of your fascination. Today enough of a slide has occurred to have aptly validated the fears of the Founder's, as the outcomes of their concern in the form of a deteriorating State are with us. Mayors defy Presidents, peep squeak judges interfere with issues of national security, every Democrat is only and always a no vote and as we have seen, the purveyors of compromise through clever and guileful legal manipulations have successfully breached the very wall upon which their entire argument is built. That is additionally, the reason I like to substantiate my arguments using the foundation of all truth, God's Holy and inerrant Word.

The wall of the liberal vision would limit the Church only, not the State; Which according to you has the authority to circumvent God's law under the concept of equal protection. It was the State which flew in on the wings of malfeasance to legalize abortion on demand and oversaw the repeal of DADT. The Founders recognized, rightly, that the State is merely a reflection of those who wield power at any given point in history. Therefore, their attempt to carefully craft a Constitution which could not be easily run over. But as Roe v Wade demonstrated, evil is not in any way deterred by the efforts of men. And because the State is all powerful where the law is concerned, it is important that the only secular control put on them, the US Constitution in this case, be strictly maintained ala the originalist. Hence the concerns of the late Antonin Scalia and even Ben Franklin for that matter, who famously said that we have a republic, IF we can keep it.

The living document crowd are usurpers and polluters of the gold standard of our republic's founding. Ironically, you and the liberal bigs you imitate, try to use the law to run over the law. Libs constructed a wall to protect the machinations of government from the Church, which they immediately breached in order to regulate even the Church on grounds of morality and fairness. Consider for just a second how ridiculous that position really is, is. The inference is that God is not fair in His thinking, and man must through his laughable wisdom, somehow right the situation. And what did man's wisdom deliver to 'The People?' Abortion on demand (60 million slaughtered to date and rising exponentially) and legalized homosexuality. And the bill for same BTW.

The wall therefore is anything but a barrier. It is rather a means by which the State can control the Church, keeping the pearls of The Omniscient Lord out of our legal arguments. Push on in your pathetic self-styled intellectuality there grasshopper, and we will see very soon now if man's rebellion can prevail. Your arguments are the parroted talking points of the usurper, who have set up camp among the Democrats and turned the entire party into progressives. Ask Hillary and Bernard Sanders about it.