[The Urban Sombrero]

Not according to God, or sound logic for that matter.

The only thing homosexuals have gotten for their efforts, are taxpayer funded benefits and legal recourse forced upon an unwilling public. But the function of the federal government was never to guarantee or grant validity to those with a bent to sexually depraved behavior. Such is what they crave but no law can ever grant. And though your ilk would use it for that, and argue with your last breath that you're right, the bulk of America knows better. The stuff you shovel is the liberal's attempt to lend unmerited dignity to unacceptable and according to God, unnatural behaviors. Just as judicial eloquence under the expanded auspices of the right to privacy never quite managed to build a bridge between murder, aka abortion on demand, aka women's health, and morally acceptable behavior.

The separation argument is the reasoning behind the open rebellion men mounted against the authority of God. Because as our system of law is based in the Christian understanding of morality, how could one then argue with omniscience, infallibility and righteousness, right? Lawyers therefore, had to get Christian precepts out of the way if they ever hoped to prevail in moral matters. The only smoke being blown on here is produced during one of your many defenses for sin and/or depravity. But your dutiful compulsion to preach the liberal message provides a much needed service, and for that I am happy to set the record straight as often as I have occasion.

Once again, advocating for equal protection under the law for ALL is not a defense of any behavior. Singling out behaviors, skin colors, ethnicities, as your understanding would allow, is a threat, and has proven so time and again in history, to egalitarian principle and equal protection, and try as you might to equate belief in a Constitutional principle to rebellion, you fail. Miserably.