[TheRealThing]

Correction: nowhere have I argued that homosexuality is consistent with a godly lifestyle. Nor is adultery. Nor is cheating on income taxes. Nor is viewing pornography. However, the adulterer, the cheat, the pornography addict, ALL are covered by equal protection under the law. How about the gossip? the liar? the backbiter? the sower of dissension? All are covered by equal protection under the law. Now, under a "separation of church and state" government, TRT argues that homosexuals are a special class. The gossip may marry. The tax cheat may marry. The backbiter may marry. But, the homosexual may not. The issue is not whether or not the gossip or cheat or adulterer is living a godly lifestyle in the "eyes" of Constitutional principle, and, if you had any objectivity at all, you could see that blindness to religious conviction and preference protects ALL of us from the horrendous atrocities of history done in the name of this or that religion, atrocities, unfortunately, which continue to the present moment, as in London today.

Oh I grant you correction is needed alright, but then, one has to be willing to be corrected.

Maybe I missed it but I didn't catch the news where the SCOTUS made protected classes out of adulterers, tax cheats, porno addicts, gossips or liars. I did hear about them doing that for the homosexual however. The court granted protection for depravity, a moral sin. How was it you put it, separation of church and state, the difference between secular and sacred? The State crossed and that's okay with you because you have an emotional agreement with them.