[TheRealThing]

Here is just where you struggle with nuance: defending equal protection under the law services all citizens, protects those with whom we agree and disagree, approve of and disapprove of. Folks of your ILK want to make the true espouser of human freedom somehow outside the fold of grace. I picture you as one seeking to correct Christ, lecturing him AT LENGTH on the need for conservatism and fundamentalism.

And yet it is I who continually defends His Word, while you continually deny same.

Like I said already, you brought up a defense of sexual depravity within the first ten posts you made on here as Sombrero. You can remount that defense from any angle and with whatever late breaking rationalization imaginable, but it will never make what is wrong right. In any case, nobody's rights were being denied back in 2008 when the object of your affection rose to power.

ABTW, nuance means a subtle difference. Hardly grounds to turn the Constitution on it's head, but all the revisionist liberal has on which to pin his hopes.