[The Urban Sombrero]

LOL, your gift for irony is boundless, is it more foolish to recognize the sovereignty of God, or to deny same? David Stockman, (the aide turned critic and foe of the Reagan Administration and coiner of the term 'trickle-down-economics,' of which you are so enamored) came on TV right before the election and stated categorically that the DJ average would fall more than 4,000 points should Trump be elected and would not recover. I mean, that's just one of the ridiculous predictions he made but let's give credit where it's due, Stockman is 0-fer on all his predictions of doom. Or as your former political hero might say, he hasn't been even a smidgeon right on any of this stuff yet.

But as I have told you repeatedly, one cannot compartmentalize truth. I don't nor would I need to 'carry over' truth. Truth occupies it's station in natural order because as God has said;
Isaiah 55:11 (KJV)
11 So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.

If it's all the same to you or if it isn't, I will continue to build my impression of truth upon the foundation of His establishment. You are free to go your own way as it would seem you may be limited in recognizing the fact that spiritual truths are spiritually discerned; 1 Corinthians 2:14 (KJV)
14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

On the lighter side, in reading your post and the awkward integration of the word zeitgeist, I see you have discovered your new word of the day. :Thumbs:

Now, pray tell, TRT, what is "God's" position on pre-existing conditions? Here is a cancer drug. Only those with income enough to buy certain kinds of insurance can afford it. All others die earlier. Now, TRT, pray tell what is "God's" position on that? Nuance and compromise are not the same, not remotely close.