[The Urban Sombrero]

Yeah clarity is the issue, that's for sure and we both know you don't have the first clue if what Trump said is true or false. But this was your first statement on the matter,
"Deflectgate" The use of Twitter in the attemp to deflect a news story with wild, unsubstantiated accusation."
Mark Levin's comments alone blew that out of the water, and he's no Trump surrogate to be certain. You chose to totally sidestep his very lucid analysis, and as he said, the relative issue isn't the tweets, it's whether the tweets are founded in fact. He says they likely are, as do a number of other highly respected present and former officials of the Justice Department.

He also says the whole effort is meant to bring down a legitimately elected President. I'd say two FISA applications and covert ops to bring about the downfall of a President might just barely qualify as a big fight in the mind of most.

You cite Levin. Lucidity is not the test of accuracy. I realize President Trump's sleep- deprived tweeting is problematic for the rabid partisan; however, it is what it is. I do not believe irresponsible tweeting is cause for impeachment. I do believe it moves the Administration off message. Back in the day, rabid partisans shouted "impeachment" at Obama. Politics is rough business. Again, members of his own Administration dread with chagrin the President's tweeting.