[TheRealThing]

I speak of some monolithic monster called "the left" that you attribute to me as some card carrying member. My interest in the gay marriage issue is strictly a matter of Constitutional principle, the lone source of our debate in regards that issue.
Paul said the battle is not with flesh and blood, and while rebellion and obstinance and delusion certainly run amok in this culture, and every other one, I just don't think marrying politics and matters of faith with a cocksure, beligerent smugness is wise. But, let every person judge that for him or her self.

As to the judiciary declaring "legal" and "natural": I do not think the majority sought to make a religious argument. I think they found equal protection to extend. The United States is not the church, and the church is not the United States.

That is the same argument made by Pilate. I'd hate to think how he'd respond if you could ask how that worked out for him. You can't have it both ways, for as Christ said, a house divided against itself cannot stand.

We are God's creation, and if the Scriptures are correct, He cares deeply about the affairs of men. Therefore the cocksure smugness, though belligerent would be more aptly attributable to your response. Legal and natural are terms to be found in the founding documents, or are you bound to deny that too?